Journal Search Engine
Search Advanced Search Adode Reader(link)
Download PDF Export Citaion korean bibliography PMC previewer
ISSN : 1225-2964(Print)
ISSN : 2287-3317(Online)
Annals of Animal Resource Sciences Vol.22 No.2 pp.89-94
DOI :

홀스타인 미경산우의 수정란 이식을 위한 수란우 선정 효율에 대한 평가

박성재1*, 백광수1, 임현주1, 허태영1, 기광석1, 이경석1, 이현준1, 김남형2, 김흥률3, 장원경1, 권응기1
농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원1, 충북대학교 농업생명환경대학2, 농협중앙회3

Evaluation of Recipient Efficiency for Embryo Transfer in Holstein Heifers

Sung Jai Park1*, Kwang Soo Baek1, Hyun Joo Lim1, Tai Young Hur1, Kwang Seok Ki1, Kyung Suk Lee1, Hyun June Lee1, Nam Hyung Kim2, Hung Rul Kim3, Won Kyong Chang1, Eung Gi Kwon1
1National Institute of Animal Science, R.D.A.
2Chungbuk National University
3National Agricultural Cooperative Federation

Abstract

A study was conducted to investigate the efficiency of recipient for Embryo Transfer (ET) in HolsteinHeifers. A total of 193 heifers (Age 14-20 months and body weight, 250-400 Kg) was assigned in 2 groups(natural ovulation cycle group and Hormone-induced ovulation synchronization group) based on thedevelopment of corpus luteum (CL) and uterus where 28.49% (55/193) heifers were in normal estrous. The ETtechnique was applied in both of the groups to transfer the embryo in the recipients and evaluated theirefficiency. In vivo frozen embryos were used for ET at the blastocyst stage. Results showed that according torecipient preparation method the conception rates were 22.72% (10/44) and 40.26% (60/149) in hormone-inducedovulation synchronization group and natural ovulation cycle group, respectively. The pregnancy rate of heiferswas significantly higher (p<0.05) during the first time ET compared to repeat ET; however, recipient showed nosignificant difference in CL development in both side. The conception rate were 31.03% (9/29), 37.75% (57/151)and 15.38% (2/13) at day 6, 7 and 8, respectively after the CL development of the heifers. The conception ratewas significantly higher (p<0.05) in the right side compared to left side of the CL development. In addition,during ET anesthesia group and non anesthesia group conception rate of the recipient were 27.63% (21/76) and41.88% (49/117), respectively.

Reference